MindKeepr
Comparison

Guru vs Confluence

Confluence is where documents live: published per-seat pricing, a free tier, and AI metered in credits. Guru is a layer that verifies knowledge and delivers answers across your tools, with no published pricing. The real question is whether your problem is writing things down or keeping them correct.

How this page is written. MindKeepr sells a product in this category, so we only state things each company publishes on its own pages, and link to every one. Vendors change their pages. Everything below was checked on 27 September 2026 and is worth verifying before you buy.
Guru
Confluence
What is it for?
An AI knowledge layer that structures, verifies and delivers answers across your stack, sold with a solution engineering team and delivered into other tools over MCP. source
A team workspace built on pages and spaces, with templates, databases, whiteboards and a structured page tree. source
What does it cost?
Not published. The pricing page describes package contents and directs you to a scoping conversation. source
Published. Free for up to 10 users, Standard at 5.42 US dollars per user per month and Premium at 10.44 US dollars per user per month on monthly billing, with Enterprise quoted by sales and billed annually. source
How is AI charged?
Included in the package. The pricing page lists AI search, knowledge agents and deep research as part of the platform. source
Metered. Atlassian Rovo is included from the Standard plan with 25 credits per user per month and 100 indexed objects per user, rising to 70 credits and 250 objects on Premium and 150 credits and 625 objects on Enterprise. source
Is single sign-on included?
Listed as part of the platform, alongside SCIM and role-based access. source
No. The pricing page states that SSO, SCIM and mobile app management require a separate Atlassian Guard Standard subscription. source
How does content stay accurate?
Verification workflows and usage signals are named on the pricing page, along with automated knowledge quality and maintenance, and corrections that propagate. source
Through the team. Confluence provides page versioning, page insights, archiving and permissions; keeping a page current is an editorial responsibility rather than a product mechanism. source
What scale does it state?
Not published as a user limit. The pricing page states 100 or more integrations and centralised audit logs across all consumers. source
Up to 250,000 users per site, one site below Enterprise and up to 150 sites on Enterprise, with a 99.9 per cent uptime SLA on Premium and 99.95 per cent on Enterprise. source

These are not the same kind of product

Confluence is a place to put things. Its published feature list is about pages, spaces, templates, whiteboards, permissions and version history, and it is priced like infrastructure: there is a free tier and a per-seat rate you can read without talking to anyone.

Guru is a layer over the places things already are. Its pricing page barely mentions authoring. It talks about structuring, verifying and delivering answers, and about pushing that governed knowledge into the other AI tools you run.

So the comparison only makes sense if you frame it as a question about your actual problem. Teams that cannot write anything down need a workspace. Teams that have written plenty down and cannot trust it need something else.

The two costs people miss on Confluence

The first is single sign-on. On the pricing page, SSO and SCIM are not part of Standard or Premium; they require an Atlassian Guard Standard subscription on top. For a security team treating SSO as non-negotiable, the per-seat figure on the pricing page is not the figure you will pay.

The second is AI metering. Rovo is included from Standard, but in credits: 25 per user per month with 100 indexed objects per user, rising through the tiers. Credits and indexed-object caps are a genuinely different model from an AI layer bundled into a platform price, and it is worth modelling against how often you expect people to ask questions.

Neither of these is a criticism. They are published, they are ordinary for the category, and Confluence at the Standard rate is inexpensive software. They just change the comparison.

The accuracy question decides it

Every wiki starts clean. What happens over three years is that pages accumulate, some are superseded and nobody deletes them, and the search box returns a confident answer from a document that was overruled two years ago.

Confluence gives you the tools to manage that: versioning, insights on which pages are read, archiving, permissions. They are real, and they all depend on someone choosing to use them.

Guru's proposition is that this should be a property of the system rather than a matter of discipline, which is why verification workflows and automated knowledge quality sit at the top of its pricing page. Whether that is worth an unpublished enterprise price instead of a published per-seat one is exactly the decision you are making.

Disclosure: where MindKeepr fits

MindKeepr is neither a wiki nor a general knowledge layer, and it does not replace Confluence. We work over the systems you already have.

The gap we address is the one neither product is built for: the reasoning that was never written down anywhere, because the person who held it did not know it was worth writing. A wiki cannot store what nobody authored, and a verification workflow cannot verify a page that does not exist.

MindKeepr finds the decisions and context that only one person has ever touched, routes a short question on each to a named colleague with a deadline, and refuses to answer when nothing verified supports an answer, naming what is missing instead.

Questions people ask

Is Guru a replacement for Confluence?

Not usually, because they do different jobs. Confluence is where pages are written and stored; Guru is a layer that verifies knowledge and serves answers across the tools you run, including Confluence itself, which is listed among its integrations. Most organisations evaluating Guru are adding it over existing systems rather than switching off their wiki.

How much does Confluence cost?

On the pricing page at the time of writing, Confluence is free for up to 10 users, 5.42 US dollars per user per month on Standard and 10.44 US dollars per user per month on Premium under monthly billing, with Enterprise quoted by sales and billed annually. Single sign-on is not included and requires a separate Atlassian Guard Standard subscription.

Does Confluence include AI?

Atlassian Rovo is included from the Standard plan, metered in credits: 25 credits per user per month and 100 indexed objects per user on Standard, 70 credits and 250 objects on Premium, and 150 credits and 625 objects on Enterprise. It is included but capped rather than unlimited.

Does Confluence include SSO?

No. The Confluence pricing page states that SSO, SCIM and mobile app management require an Atlassian Guard Standard subscription in addition to the Confluence plan, on every tier including Premium.

Which is better for a knowledge base, Guru or Confluence?

If the problem is that nothing is written down, Confluence is cheaper, published and designed for authoring. If the problem is that plenty is written down and nobody trusts it, the maintenance and verification mechanisms Guru puts at the centre of its product are the thing you are actually buying.

Sources

Product names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. We are not affiliated with them. If you believe anything here misstates your product, write to us and we will correct it.

MindKeepr vs ConfluenceGuru vs GleanKnowledge base, definedConfluence and AI: limits and fixes

Worried about what leaves with a person, not what is hard to find?

That is the problem MindKeepr is built for.

Request a demoHow coverage works